Place your order
Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.
Proceed with the payment
Receive the final file
Case: Salib v. City of Mesa Facts: Edward Salib owned a Winchell’s Donut House
GET HELP WITH YOUR ESSAY
If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional Essay Writing Service is here to help!
Case: Salib v. City of Mesa
Facts: Edward Salib owned a Winchell’s Donut House in Mesa, Arizona. Salib displayed large signs in his store window. The City ordered Salib to remove the signs as they violated the Sign Code which prohibited covering more than 30% of store’s windows with signs. Salib sued claiming the Sign Code violated his First Amendment rights. The trial court ruled in favor of Mesa, and Salib appealed.
Using the IRAC method of case analysis, please analyze this case. First, please answer the questions below.
What is the issue in this case? What question is before the court?
What is the rule in this case? The rule is the legal principle(s) the court will use to answer the issue.
Next, read the Holding of the case below, then complete the exercise that follows.
Holding: The trial court ruling is affirmed. Commercial speech that concerns any unlawful activity or that which is false or misleading is not protected by the First Amendment. However, all other speech may be regulated if the government can satisfy a three-prong test. First, the government must show a substantial interest in support of the regulation. Both parties agree that aesthetics is such a substantial interest.
Second, the government must show that the challenged regulation advances that interest in a direct and material way. Here Salib argues that Mesa cannot satisfy this prong because they have conducted no studies proving what aesthetic or safety problem existed and how the Sign Code could solve such problems. Mesa claims that the Sign Code was passed in response to legitimate concerns of business owners that many businesses in the area had 100% window coverage and that detracted from the aesthetic of the city. Moreover, the city council received considerable input on sign coverage of windows before passing the Code. The constitution does not require studies to show that the city’s interests are being advanced by the regulation.
Lastly, Salib argues that the Sign Code is not narrowly tailored. However, narrowly tailored does not mean that the last restrictive means must be used to accomplish the City’s goals. A “reasonable fit” between the intent of the law and the means used to accomplish that intent is sufficient. Mesa claims that 30% is a reasonable compromise between 100% coverage and a total ban on signage. The court is not in a position to determine what percentage of coverage is the best solution, only that the 30% standard adopted by the City was reasonable in order to fulfill the goals of the Code.
Underline the text that illustrates the rule of law in this case.
Highlight the text that illustrates the court’s analysis of the case in a color of your choice.
What was the court’s conclusion in this case?
I sent you IRAC analysis example. Please read it. Thanks
Top quality papers
We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university, or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.
We have hired a team of professionals who provide expert academic help. Most of them are native speakers and PhD holders who are able to take care of any assignment you need help with.
If you feel that we missed something, send the order for a free revision. You will have 10 days to send the order for revision after you receive the final paper. You can either do it on your own after signing in to your personal account or by contacting our support team.
On Time Delivery
All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.
Our support agents are available 24/7 and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.
We use several checkers to make sure that all papers you receive are plagiarism-free. Our editors carefully go through all sources and in-text citations. We also promise full confidentiality in all our services.
Customer satisfaction has always been one of our basic concerns. If you don’t feel satisfied with our delivered work, you can request for a refund.
We assure you that your document will be thoroughly checked for plagiarism and grammatical errors as we use highly authentic and licit sources.
Our confidential essay writing service protects your privacy
We cherish your trust and do our best to protect you. Anything that you share with our private essay writing service is never misused as the access to your personal data is very limited. Your payment details and credit card number also fall under strict protection when you buy a custom essay online from us.
Meet Our Team
Wondering who’s working behind the scenes of our professional essay writing service? We have over 700 amazing people on our team including developers, QA engineers, designers, managers, HR specialists, marketers, essay writers, and many more. See who takes care of the orders you place.
There are 400+ essay writers from all over the world on our team who go through a 3-step hiring process. We call them super-writers because most of them have master’s degrees; therefore, they know the ins and outs of the discipline in which they specialize.
Our extra-fast and caring support assistants answer your questions 24/7 and resolve any of your troubles. Our team was even nominated for the 2019 Best Quality Management Team Award by the European Contact Centre & Customer Service.
Talk To Us
Need any help? Feel free to Send Us a Note